Twitter Google Plus Pinterest

Error message

  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 692 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 695 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 696 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 697 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 700 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 702 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 290 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 291 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 299 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 306 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_settings_initialize() (line 806 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • User warning: The following module is missing from the file system: sparta. For information about how to fix this, see the documentation page. in _drupal_trigger_error_with_delayed_logging() (line 1143 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in _menu_load_objects() (line 579 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/menu.inc).

Taylor Swift Covers Not Selling On Newsstands As Strongly As You'd Think

Taylor Swift seemed to be everywhere in 2012 and again in 2013, popping up on every other magazine cover. Here's Swift for Vogue! For Glamour! For Cosmo! Oh wait, now she's on Vanity Fair, too?

Swift had almost as many magazine covers in the past year as she had boyfriends. But Women's Wear Daily reports that the wall-to-wall T-Swift coverage didn't actually bring in major traffic. In fact, most of Swift's covers bombed on the newsstands.

According to WWD's annual report, which culls numbers from the Alliance for Audited Media, sales of Swift's Vogue cover fell short of both Lady Gaga and Adele's 2012 Vogue covers. Sales of Swift's Glamour cover fell below that of Lauren Conrad and Victoria Beckham's, as did sales of her Harper's Bazaar cover (which we could've seen coming a mile away -- Bazaar readers aren't exactly Swift's teen demo). Lastly, Swift's Cosmo cover, which billed the singer as "crazy for a Kennedy!", bombed with slightly over one million copies sold.

These stats do not take into account the international magazines -- InStyle UK, Marie Claire UK -- nor sales of her more recent covers for Vanity Fair or Elle.

So does Swift's newsstand success mirror her love life -- flashy new developments at every turn that flop just as quickly as they began? Glamour's editor-in-chief Cindi Leive actually draws a connection between Swift's cover failures and her revolving door of boyfriends. "There may have been a little hiccup for her right around the 1-D relationship," she mused to WWD, obviously referring to Swift's dalliance with Harry Styles.

Maybe all of the headlines that Swift makes while off-duty are distracting from the intended magazine headlines. Or perhaps all the boyfriends and feuds have overexposed her to the point that we don't need Cosmo or Glamour to tell us about her personal life (a notion other media outlets have acknowledged).

Or perhaps, while we love listening to Taylor's tunes and clicking on her Grammy GIFs, we just don't idolize her as a fashion icon.

Read more at WWD.com and tell us what you think. Are you more or less likely to buy a fashion mag with Swift on the cover?

Taylor's been on a lot of covers... and with a lot of guys:

Want more? Be sure to check out HuffPost Style on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest and Instagram at @HuffPostStyle.
--
Do you have a style story idea or tips? Email us at stylesubmissions@huffingtonpost.com. (PR pitches sent to this address will be ignored.)

Source