Twitter Google Plus Pinterest

Error message

  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 692 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 695 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 696 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 697 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 700 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 702 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 290 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 291 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 299 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 306 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_settings_initialize() (line 806 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • User warning: The following module is missing from the file system: sparta. For information about how to fix this, see the documentation page. in _drupal_trigger_error_with_delayed_logging() (line 1143 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in _menu_load_objects() (line 579 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/menu.inc).

School District Changes Dress Code So Obese Kids Aren't Teased

Taking a swipe at potential bullying, the Dallas School Board recently altered the district's dress code to accommodate overweight kids.

Reports the Dallas Observer, the board was concerned its policy requiring students tuck in their shirts didn't accomodate children who aren't slim enough to tuck them properly, thus opening them up to ridicule and bullying.

The paper quoted Board President Lew Blackburn, who explained the situation, using "healthiness" as a euphemism for being overweight:

Now, I am always one to say tuck in your shirts, but it was brought to my attention that if you are, uh healthy, tucking in your shirt shows your healthiness. ... For a middle-school student, it could be a self-esteem issue if they are made to tuck in their shirt, because if they wear it loose, their healthiness might not show as much.

DISDBlog, a website that covers the Dallas Independent School District, quoted another board member who seemed to agree with Blackburn and who used the term "fluffy" instead of "healthy." According to NBC local affiliate WOAI, none of the members used the term "fat" or "obese" in the discussion.

Nevertheless, tucked-shirt dress code appears to have been rarely enforced prior to the board's recent decision. In a segment produced by ABC affiliate WFAA, none of the students interviewed about the policy had their shirts tucked in, and none appeared to have any physical reason to leave them un-tucked.

"The tucked-in shirt makes the muffin top a little more accentuated,” student Ruth Blaker explained to the station. Added another student, Jake Whitten, "It’s embarrassing for some kids who are heavier-set."

What do you think? How should the school board have handled this issue? Tell us in the comments.