Twitter Google Plus Pinterest

Error message

  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 692 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 695 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 696 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 697 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 700 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 702 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 290 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 291 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 299 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 306 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_settings_initialize() (line 806 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • User warning: The following module is missing from the file system: sparta. For information about how to fix this, see the documentation page. in _drupal_trigger_error_with_delayed_logging() (line 1143 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in _menu_load_objects() (line 579 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/menu.inc).

Can You Fat-Shame the Shameless?

Has the national media's nonstop coverage of Kim Kardashian taken on a whiff of fat-shaming in her pregnancy? The Daily Beast thinks so, citing hyperbolic tabloid covers such as "Pregnant Kim's Nightmare: 65 Pound Weight Gain," and "Kim's 200 LB Nightmare: I Can't Stop Eating!," the latter of which I'll confess to giggling at while standing in line at Duane Reade, where I was stocking up on Cadbury cream eggs, which, seriously, I can't stop eating.

I'll further admit that we at the Cut are undeniably uncomfortable-shaming Kardashian, mostly because the childless imagine pregnancy foremost as the one period in our lives when we will feel excused from worrying about the definition of our waists. Quite simply, we detect a missed opportunity for Kim.

But it’s hard for me to disentangle fat-shaming from pregnancy coverage. It's well-established that all stages and aspects of female fertility will be dramatized for tabloid-narrative purposes, including being pregnant, trying to get pregnanthaving a miscarriage, and breast-feeding. (Someone braver than I can predict which pioneering tabloid will publish a young Disney star's "My First Period" story.) I’m not saying it’s right, but the Kardashians are not exactly leading the fight against nonconsensual prurience alongside Anne Hathaway and Jon Hamm. If anything, the Kardashians reinforce it on their suite of television programs, where you can literally watch Kourtney pull daughter Penelope out of her vagina. Weight gain is expected and acceptable during pregnancy, so where is the shame? (Save on the tabloids, for expecting us to believe she weighs 200 pounds.) It's especially hard to feel bad when one remembers how much money she stands to make losing it, with an endorsement deal from Jenny Craig or Weight Watchers, to say nothing of the many "How Kim Got Her Bikini Body Back" stories we will likely suffer at the end of this year. 

As for today’s New York Post cover, it seemed mostly to share our incredulity at Kardashian’s masochistic maternitywear from a place of awe, not judgment. I agree that the Shamu joke going around Tumblr and Reddit took it a little too far. 

Read more posts by Kat Stoeffel

Filed Under:
fame
,love and war
,kim kardashian
,shame-shaming
,pregnancy
,baby weight

Source