Twitter Google Plus Pinterest

Error message

  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 692 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 695 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 696 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 697 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 700 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 702 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 290 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 291 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 299 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in include_once() (line 306 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set() has been disabled for security reasons in drupal_settings_initialize() (line 806 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • User warning: The following module is missing from the file system: sparta. For information about how to fix this, see the documentation page. in _drupal_trigger_error_with_delayed_logging() (line 1143 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in _menu_load_objects() (line 579 of /home/buyceleb/public_html/includes/menu.inc).

Spanx Lawsuit Pits Company Against Yummie Tummie Over Shapewear Patents

Spanx is currently embroiled in a legal battle with fellow shapewear brand Yummie Tummie.

Heather Thomson, creator of the latter brand (and "Real Housewives of New York" alum) alleges that Spanx ripped off several of Yummie Tummie's signature control tops and violated the company's patents. According to Women's Wear Daily, Thomson was sent a package with an "anonymous" note and a few of the aforementioned copied tops. She tells WWD:

“I immediately recognized it as my original Yummie Tummie tank. We contacted Spanx by letter [through legal counsel] on Jan. 18 to notify them that they were infringing on my patent ideas and we asked them to cease and desist. Spanx then asked for a [one-month] extension to be able to do their own due diligence .…They responded on Feb. 14 saying they didn’t think there was any patent infringement and requested another extension.”

Spanx's response? Filing a declaratory judgment claiming that they “have not infringed and do not infringe any valid claim of the patents-in-suit.” WWD also received an email statement from Spanx stating, "Spanx was making shaping camisoles long before Yummie Tummie" -- which is true. Sara Blakely, the youngest woman on Forbes' billionaires list at 27 years old, created Spanx Inc. in 2000, while Thomson founded Times Three Clothier LLC, which includes Yummie Tummie, in 2008.

This isn't the first time we've seen a fashion patent quibble lead to legal action. Last August, Lululemon took Calvin Klein to court over their "Astro" pants that were a little too similar to the former company's yoga pants. But how much is intellectual property protected in an industry that seems to run on copies and fakes? Forever 21 seems to be doing just fine with its business model, winning most knockoff cases that come its way. Given that the courts have been kind to those fashion companies who copy, should Spanx just take their chances?

Thomson seems to think not. The Yummie Tummie president is confidant about her chances for success, telling WWD “I hope [Spanx] is ready for war because I will not lie down.”

Who do you think should come out on top in this one: Spanx or Yummie Tummie? Sound off in the comments!

Read the full story at WWD.

Spanx has some famous fans...

Want more? Be sure to check out HuffPost Style on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest and Instagram at @HuffPostStyle.
--
Do you have a style story idea or tip? Email us at stylesubmissions@huffingtonpost.com. (PR pitches sent to this address will be ignored.)

Source